NAME¶
Test::LectroTest::Property - Properties that make testable claims about your
software
VERSION¶
version 0.5001
SYNOPSIS¶
use MyModule; # provides my_function_to_test
use Test::LectroTest::Generator qw( :common );
use Test::LectroTest::Property qw( Test );
use Test::LectroTest::TestRunner;
my $prop_non_neg = Property {
##[ x <- Int, y <- Int ]##
$tcon->label("negative") if $x < 0;
$tcon->label("odd") if $x % 2;
$tcon->retry if $y == 0; # 0 can't be used in test
my_function_to_test( $x, $y ) >= 0;
}, name => "my_function_to_test output is non-negative";
my $runner = Test::LectroTest::TestRunner->new();
$runner->run_suite(
$prop_non_neg,
# ... more properties here ...
);
DESCRIPTION¶
STOP! If you're just looking for an easy way to write and run unit tests,
see Test::LectroTest first. Once you're comfortable with what is presented
there and ready to delve into the full offerings of properties, this is the
document for you.
This module allows you to define Properties that can be checked automatically by
Test::LectroTest. A Property is a specification of your software's required
behavior over a given set of conditions. The set of conditions is given by a
generator-binding specification. The required behavior is defined implicitly
by a block of code that tests your software for a given set of generated
conditions; if your software matches the expected behavor, the block of code
returns true; otherwise, false.
This documentation serves as reference documentation for LectroTest Properties.
If you don't understand the basics of Properties yet, see "OVERVIEW"
in Test::LectroTest::Tutorial before continuing.
Two ways to create Properties¶
There are two ways to create a property:
- 1.
- Use the "Property" function to promote a block of code that
contains both a generator-binding specification and a behavior test into a
Test::LectroTest::Property object. This is the preferred method.
Example:
my $prop1 = Property {
##[ x <- Int ]##
thing_to_test($x) >= 0;
}, name => "thing_to_test is non-negative";
- 2.
- Use the "new" method of Test::LectroTest::Property and provide
it with the necessary ingredients via named parameters:
my $prop2 = Test::LectroTest::Property->new(
inputs => [ x => Int ],
test => sub { my ($tcon,$x) = @_;
thing_to_test($x) >= 0 },
name => "thing_to_test is non-negative"
);
Both are equivalent, but the first is concise, easier to read, and lets
LectroTest do some of the heavy lifting for you. The second is probably
better, however, if you are constructing property specifications
programmatically.
Generator-binding specification¶
The generator-binding specification declares that certain variables are to be
bound to certain kinds of random-value generators during the tests of your
software's behavior. The number and kind of generators define the
"condition space" that is examined during property checks.
If you use the "Property" function to create your properties, your
generator-binding specification must come first in your code block, and you
must use the following syntax:
##[ var1 <- gen1, var2 <- gen2, ... ]##
Comments are not allowed within the specification, but you may break it across
multiple lines:
##[ var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
]##
or
##[
var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
]##
Further, for better integration with syntax-highlighting IDEs, the terminating
"]##" delimiter may be preceded by a hash symbol "#" and
optional whitespace to make it appear like a comment:
##[
var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
# ]##
On the other hand, if you use "Test::LectroTest::Property->new()"
to create your objects, the generator-binding specification takes the form of
an array reference containing variable-generator pairs that is passed to
"new()" via the parameter named "inputs":
inputs => [ var1 => gen1, var2 => gen2, ... ]
Normal Perl syntax applies here.
Specifying multiple sets of generator bindings¶
Sometimes you may want to repeat a property check with multiple sets of
generator bindings. This can happen, for instance, when your condition space
is vast and you want to ensure that a particular portion of it receives
focused coverage while still sampling the overall space. For times like this,
you can list multiple sets of bindings within the "##[" and
"]##" delimiters, like so:
##[ var1 <- gen1A, ... ],
[ var1 <- gen1B, ... ],
... more sets of bindings ...
[ var1 <- gen1N, ... ]##
Note that only the first and last set need the special delimiters.
The equivalent when using "new()" is as follows:
inputs => [ [ var1 => gen1A, ... ],
[ var1 => gen1B, ... ],
...
[ var1 => gen1N, ... ] ]
Regardless of how you declare the sets of bindings, each set must provide
bindings for the exact same set of variables. (The generators, of course, can
be different.) For example, this kind of thing is illegal:
##[ x <- Int ], [ y <- Int ]##
The above is illegal because both sets of bindings must use
x or both
must use
y; they can't each use a different variable.
##[ x <- Int ],
[ x <- Int, y <- Float ]##
The above is illegal because the second set has an extra variable that isn't
present in the first. Both sets must use exactly the same variables. None of
the variables may be extra, none may be missing, and all must be named
identically across the sets of bindings.
Behavior test¶
The behavior test is a subroutine that accepts a test-controller object and a
given set of input conditions, tests your software's observed behavior against
the required behavior with respect to the input conditions, and returns true
or false to indicate acceptance or rejection. If you are using the
"Property" function to create your property objects, lexically bound
variables are created and loaded with values automatically, per your
input-generator specification, so you can just go ahead and use the variables
immediately:
my $prop = Property {
##[ i <- Int, delta <- Float(range=>[0,1]) ]##
my $lo_val = my_thing_to_test($i);
my $hi_val = my_thing_to_test($i + $delta);
$lo_val == $hi_val;
}, name => "my_thing_to_test ignores fractions" ;
On the other hand, if you are using
"Test::LectroTest::Property->new()", you must declare and
initialize these variables manually from Perl's @_ variable
in
lexicographically increasing order after receiving $tcon, the test
controller object. (This inconvenience, by the way, is why the former method
is preferred.) The hard way:
my $prop = Test::LectroTest::Property->new(
inputs => [ i => Int, delta => Float(range=>[0,1]) ],
test => sub {
my ($tcon, $delta, $i) = @_;
my $lo_val = my_thing_to_test($i);
my $hi_val = my_thing_to_test($i + $delta);
$lo_val == $hi_val
},
name => "my_thing_to_test ignores fractions"
) ;
Control logic, retries, and labeling¶
Inside the behavior test, you have access to a special variable $tcon that
allows you to interact with the test controller. Through $tcon you can do the
following:
- •
- retry the current trial with different inputs (if you don't like the
inputs you were given at first)
- •
- add labels to the current trial for reporting purposes
- •
- attach notes and variable dumps to the current trial for diagnostic
purposes, should the trial fail
(For the full details of what you can do with $tcon see the
"testcontroller" section of Test::LectroTest::TestRunner.)
For example, let's say that we have written a function "my_sqrt" that
returns the square root of its input. In order to check whether our
implementation fulfills the mathematical definition of square root, we might
specify the following property:
my $epsilon = 0.000_001;
Property {
##[ x <- Float ]##
return $tcon->retry if $x < 0;
$tcon->label("less than one") if $x < 1;
my $sx = my_sqrt( $x );
abs($sx * $sx - $x) < $epsilon;
}, name => "my_sqrt satisfies defn of square root";
Because we don't want to deal with imaginary numbers, our square-root function
is defined only over non-negative numbers. To make sure we don't accidentally
check our property "at" a negative number, we use the following line
to re-start the trial with a different input should the input we are given at
first be negative:
return $tcon->retry if $x < 0;
An interesting fact is that for all values
x between zero and one, the
square root of
x is larger than
x itself. Perhaps our
implementation treats such values as a special case. In order to be confident
that we are checking this case, we added the following line:
$tcon->label("less than one") if $x < 1;
In the property-check output, we can see what percentage of the trials checked
this case:
1..1
ok 1 - 'my_sqrt satisfies defn of square root' (1000 attempts)
# 1% less than one
Trivial cases¶
Random-input generators may create some inputs that are trivial and don't
provide much testing value. To make it easy to label such cases, you can use
the following from within your behavior tests:
$tcon->trivial if ... ;
The above is exactly equivalent to the following:
$tcon->label("trivial") if ... ;
SEE ALSO¶
Test::LectroTest::Generator describes the many generators and generator
combinators that you can use to define the test or condition spaces that you
want LectroTest to search for bugs.
Test::LectroTest::TestRunner describes the objects that check your properties
and tells you how to turn their control knobs. You'll want to look here if
you're interested in customizing the testing procedure.
HERE BE SOURCE FILTERS¶
The special syntax used to specify generator bindings relies upon a source
filter (see Filter::Util::Call). If you don't want to use the syntax, you can
disable the filter like so:
use Test::LectroTest::Property qw( NO_FILTER );
AUTHOR¶
Tom Moertel (tom@moertel.com)
INSPIRATION¶
The LectroTest project was inspired by Haskell's QuickCheck module by Koen
Claessen and John Hughes:
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/QuickCheck/.
COPYRIGHT and LICENSE¶
Copyright (c) 2004-13 by Thomas G Moertel. All rights reserved.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the same terms as Perl itself.