IBV_UD_PINGPONG(1) | USER COMMANDS | IBV_UD_PINGPONG(1) |
NAME¶
ibv_ud_pingpong - simple InfiniBand UD transport test
SYNOPSIS¶
ibv_ud_pingpong [-p port] [-d device] [-i ib port] [-s size] [-r rx depth] [-n iters] [-l sl] [-e] [-g gid index] HOSTNAME
ibv_ud_pingpong [-p port] [-d device] [-i ib port] [-s size] [-r rx depth] [-n iters] [-l sl] [-e] [-g gid index]
DESCRIPTION¶
Run a simple ping-pong test over InfiniBand via the unreliable datagram (UD) transport.
OPTIONS¶
- -p, --port=PORT
- use TCP port PORT for initial synchronization (default 18515)
- -d, --ib-dev=DEVICE
- use IB device DEVICE (default first device found)
- -i, --ib-port=PORT
- use IB port PORT (default port 1)
- -s, --size=SIZE
- ping-pong messages of size SIZE (default 2048)
- -r, --rx-depth=DEPTH
- post DEPTH receives at a time (default 500)
- -n, --iters=ITERS
- perform ITERS message exchanges (default 1000)
- -l, --sl=SL
- send messages with service level SL (default 0)
- -e, --events
- sleep while waiting for work completion events (default is to poll for completions)
- -g, --gid-idx=GIDINDEX
- local port GIDINDEX
- -c, --chk
- validate received buffer
SEE ALSO¶
ibv_rc_pingpong(1), ibv_uc_pingpong(1), ibv_srq_pingpong(1), ibv_xsrq_pingpong(1)
AUTHORS¶
- Roland Dreier
- <rolandd@cisco.com>
BUGS¶
The network synchronization between client and server instances is weak, and does not prevent incompatible options from being used on the two instances. The method used for retrieving work completions is not strictly correct, and race conditions may cause failures on some systems.
August 30, 2005 | libibverbs |